legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

# Scarlett Johansson Threatens legal Action Against OpenAI

Actress Scarlett Johansson is considering taking legal action against Sam Altman and his company OpenAI for allegedly using her voice without permission in their ChatGPT system. Johansson claims that the voice used for ChatGPT’s “Sky” character is strikingly similar to hers, to the point that even her closest friends couldn’t tell the difference.

## The Issue at Hand and AI legalese decoder

The heart of the matter lies in Johansson’s assertion that Altman initially approached her to provide the voice for his AI system, but when she declined, he proceeded to replicate her voice nonetheless. This situation underscores the importance of securing proper permissions and respecting individuals’ intellectual property rights, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence development.

The AI legalese decoder could help in this scenario by analyzing the legal nuances of the situation and providing insights into the implications of using someone’s voice without explicit consent. By leveraging AI-powered tools, parties involved in similar disputes can gain a clearer understanding of the legal landscape and navigate potential legal actions more effectively.

## OpenAI’s Response and the Path Forward

Altman has refuted Johansson’s claims, stating that the voice in question does not belong to her and was not intended to mimic her voice. However, in response to the controversy, OpenAI has decided to pause the use of the Sky voice to address concerns about how the ChatGPT voices were selected.

Additionally, Johansson’s legal team has pressed Altman and OpenAI for detailed information on how the Sky voice was created, leading OpenAI to reluctantly remove the voice from their products. This development underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in AI development processes, especially when it comes to incorporating elements of real-world personalities.

## Industry Implications and the Advocacy for Creative Rights

The conflict between Johansson and OpenAI highlights broader challenges faced by creatives in an era where automated systems can potentially devalue their work. Johansson’s stance has garnered support from influential entities like SAG-AFTRA, signaling a growing concern among artists and performers regarding the protection of their voices and likenesses in the digital landscape.

AI legalese decoder can facilitate the analysis of relevant legislation and regulations that aim to safeguard individual rights in the face of technological advancements. By providing insights into legal frameworks and potential liabilities, this tool can empower creatives to protect their intellectual property effectively and advocate for greater transparency in AI development practices.

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Reference link