- April 16, 2024
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
### Investing in a World Index Without Political Agendas: How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help
If you’re interested in investing in a world index via ETF or fund but want to avoid asset managers using their voting power to push agendas such as ESG/DEI/Woke/Genders/Rainbows/Unicorns/etc, there are strategies you can implement. One option is to consider alternative asset managers that prioritize financial performance over political matters.
The three largest passive asset managers – Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard – collectively control over $20 trillion and use their substantial voting power to support social agendas that may not align with all investors’ beliefs. In light of this, some investors, like Florida, have chosen to withdraw funds from BlackRock due to concerns about their voting practices.
One potential alternative is Strive Asset Management, although it’s worth noting that they may not offer UCITS type ETFs. Another option could be exploring investment opportunities with institutions like HSBC, although recent events involving their stance on climate change and DEI initiatives may raise concerns for some investors.
### How AI Legalese Decoder Can Assist
An AI tool like Legalese Decoder can help investors navigate the complex language and legal jargon often found in investment documents and disclosures. By using AI technology, investors can gain a clearer understanding of the investment strategies and voting practices of different asset managers. This can empower investors to make informed decisions about where to place their funds, ensuring they align with their values and financial goals.
Furthermore, AI Legalese Decoder can provide insights into evolving trends in the financial industry, such as the rise of pass-through voting and the push for transparency in proxy-voting processes. By leveraging AI technology, investors can stay informed about industry developments and make educated choices about their investments.
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
AI Legalese Decoder: Simplifying Legal Jargon
Legal documents are known for their complex and confusing language, often referred to as legalese. This specialized terminology can be a barrier for many people trying to understand their rights and responsibilities.
With the help of AI Legalese Decoder, individuals can easily translate legal jargon into plain language. This innovative tool utilizes artificial intelligence to analyze and simplify complex legal terms, making it easier for non-experts to grasp the content of legal documents.
By using AI Legalese Decoder, individuals can save time and effort when reviewing legal agreements, contracts, or other important documents. This can help prevent misunderstandings or misinterpretations that could lead to costly mistakes or legal issues in the future.
Overall, AI Legalese Decoder is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the often confusing world of legal language. By providing clear and concise translations of complex legal terms, this tool is empowering individuals to better understand their rights and obligations, ultimately promoting greater access to justice for all.
****** just grabbed a
who does not have an agenda is the question ? The answer : No One. Everyone has an Agenda, especially when it comes to money.
Can you substantiate your claims or accusations , let’s say, against Vanguard? They have a very public investment stewardship program: https://corporate.vanguard.com/content/dam/corp/advocate/investment-stewardship/pdf/perspectives-and-commentary/about_our_program_2023.pdf
Florida pulling their investment in ESG is a good political stunt, but I actually happen to agree that current ESG approach is bad.
In terms of climate change, any long term investor disregarding it would be gross negligence to their fund holders. HSBC would be right to fire the person responsible for responsible investment for such comments. You might think it’s a scam, but even if it were so, no one with fiduciary duties can act on that assumption.
Maybe there should be a fund buying assets undervalued because of the climate “hoax”, but the lack of it is a signal.
I like watching woke content. Therefore if companies profit from releasing it, it’s just the market doing its thing.
Or are right wingers now anti free market?
Think of what you are asking. G means governance. So, you want ETF that only includes companies with bad governance, where they don’t fight insider trading, market manipulation, fraud etc etc?
Moreover, funds without classic “ESG” have different agenda. Conservative agenda, which can also hurt returns. For example, fines for hurting environment from government can be huge. Also, relying on fossil fuels means dead-end, and such company is doomed in the long-term. Again, not very good for returns.
And the last thing: ESG is often only marketing term and is on paper. In reality, managers still put money where they earn more. Research confirms it.
It is not possible with ETF’s since they hold a lot of different stock.
Buy single stock in lets say oil and sellf defense stock to avoid communist management.
[deleted]
Some libs in the comments literally defending the worst side of modern capitalism lmao
actually there is a simple solution.
just invest in passive funds.
passive ETFs just track an index as closely as possible, the index is often defined by a different company, and the methodology is disclosed. this makes it near impossible for the issuer of the ETF to push any type of agenda…. as they would have to somehow incorporate their agenda in the index definition metodology…. but at that point people could more easily notice they are doing that
A fund like VWCE is pretty neutral from that point of view, so it is an S&P500 etf, or anything that tracks similar indices like the the MSCI World index, Dow Jones Industrial Average, or the NASDAQ
I don’t follow you. You’re saying you refuse to invest in ETFs managed by these companies because they have an “agenda”?
Afaik, Vanguard has only one ESG-focused ETF, namely V3AA/V3AL but you personally are not obliged to throw your money on it. You can buy non-ESG ETF from said providers and that’s it. Or go full into Dow Jones which in my opinion is the most non-ESG index.
But keep in mind that you also have an agenda – to make money on the long term. Everybody has an agenda and as long as Vanguard, Blackrock or anybody else provides a fund which can fulfill my goals, what’s the problem?
Let’s take the Apple example. If Tim Cook is gay and I am straight, should I short Apple just because of that? Of course not, we’re in for the common good/interests and I don’t care about the CEO’s private life or principles.
You should be as rational as possible when it comes to money. Do not let misconceptions or stereotypes to influence your financial decisions.
Make your own tracker
I’ll just keep on sharing actual findings in contrary to others here. Also still hoping to hear about some specific funds one could resort to.
[The ESJ proxy vote ranking on WSJ](https://www.wsj.com/articles/committee-to-unleash-prosperity-esg-proxy-vote-ranking-investment-goldman-sachs-blackrock-glass-lewis-iss-29401488)
1 **Dimensional,** 9.5
2 **Vanguard** 9.2
3 **T. Rowe Price** 8.7
4 **Fidelity** 8.7
5 **BlackRock** 6.8
[Vanguard launches proxy voting choice pilot](https://corporate.vanguard.com/content/corporatesite/us/en/corp/who-we-are/pressroom/press-release-vanguard-launches-proxy-voting-choice-pilot-020123.html)
VALLEY FORGE, PA (February 1, 2023)—Vanguard today announced the launch of its proxy voting choice pilot for investors in three Vanguard equity index funds.
…
The voluntary pilot will empower investors to make their voices heard by choosing from a selection of proxy voting policy options that will direct how the funds vote on important shareholder matters at portfolio companies held in the funds.