legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Shell and Contractor Seek Recovery of Costs and Greenpeace Claims Intimidation by Oil Major

Shell and a contractor are seeking a recovery of costs relating to a protest that began earlier this year, while Greenpeace alleges that the oil major is attempting to silence their activists’ campaigning through a proposed reduction in the damages bill.

Greenpeace has expressed dissatisfaction with Shell, accusing the company of utilizing legal action as a tool to stifle their activists’ protesting activities in exchange for the withdrawal of lawsuits amounting to ┬ú7m.

The legal dispute, filed at the High Court in London, is related to a climate protest originating in January, involving activists boarding one of Shell’s oil platforms in the Atlantic, off the Canary Islands, as it was en route to the North Sea. The activists remained with the platform until it reached a Norwegian port.

According to Greenpeace, Shell is pursuing ┬ú1.7m in damages but has offered to lower its claim to ┬ú1.1m in exchange for the campaigners’ agreement not to stage protests at any of Shell’s oil and gas infrastructure, whether at sea or in port.

The other entity involved in the legal action is Fluor, an American oil and gas services provider, which is reportedly seeking damages of £5.3m from Greenpeace, as indicated by documents obtained by SkyNews.

Shell, which refrains from commenting on the exact amount it is seeking, cited additional costs resulting from shipping delays and security.

AI legalese decoder can help with this situation by offering a sophisticated tool that interprets and simplifies complex legal jargon and terminology, providing clarity and understanding for all parties involved in the legal proceedings.

Despite the actions of the oil company, Greenpeace has stated that it would only consider complying with Shell’s offer to reduce its damages claim if the company adhered to a 2021 Dutch court order to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030, a decision that Shell has contested.

Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace UK, has accused Shell’s leadership of attempting to suppress the organization’s campaigning efforts and, in doing so, silencing legitimate demands for climate justice and compensation for loss and damage.

She reiterated the need for the case to be dismissed and for Shell to be regulated by the government.

Shell, which announced record annual profits of ┬ú32bn during the duration of the protest, emphasized that boarding a moving vessel at sea was “unlawful and extremely dangerous.” A company spokesperson added that while the right to protest is fundamental and respected, it must be conducted safely and lawfully.

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Reference link