- December 7, 2023
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Charged with Speeding Offence: How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help
Speeding Offence: Understanding the Evidence
The situation at hand involves a speeding offence charge, with the only evidence being a CCTV footage from a nearby house. The “Major Crash Investigation Section Reconstruction Officers” conducted a speed analysis, calculating the speed at 100kms per hour, while the defendant believes they were travelling at less than 80kms per hour.
Questioning the Accuracy of Speed Calculations
The defendant is now questioning the accuracy of the speed calculations and seeking ways to disprove the evidence against them. With the sole evidence being a CCTV footage, there are concerns on the reliability and accuracy of the speed analysis conducted by the “Major Crash Investigation Section Reconstruction Officers.”
Seeking Ways to Disprove the Evidence
The defendant is seeking ways to disprove the evidence presented to them and to strengthen their case. They have noted that they stopped to render assistance to a major crash that occurred behind them, and they provided evidence at the scene. The defendant has maintained that they were travelling at a much lower speed than what has been estimated by the authorities.
How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help
AI Legalese Decoder presents a beneficial solution for the defendant in this case. By leveraging the AI-powered platform, the defendant can gain insights into legal terminologies, procedures, and strategies to challenge the evidence against them. The platform can provide guidance on discrediting the speed analysis and identifying flaws in the evidence presented.
Furthermore, AI Legalese Decoder can assist the defendant in understanding the nuances of the legal system and formulating a strong defense strategy. By utilizing AI to analyze legal documents, the defendant can identify potential loopholes and inconsistencies in the evidence, ultimately strengthening their position in the case.
In conclusion, the defendant’s situation of being charged with a speeding offence can be addressed effectively with the support of AI Legalese Decoder. The platform offers valuable resources and insights to challenge the evidence and build a strong defense, ultimately empowering the defendant to navigate the legal process with confidence.
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Original content:
“AI Legalese Decoder is a powerful tool that translates legal jargon into plain language. It saves time and money by simplifying complex legal documents, making them easier to understand for non-lawyers. With AI Legalese Decoder, individuals and businesses can quickly comprehend contracts, agreements, and other legal texts without the need for costly legal assistance.”
Revised content:
How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help Simplify Complex Legal Documents
In today’s fast-paced world, understanding complex legal jargon can be a time-consuming and daunting task for individuals and businesses alike. This is where AI Legalese Decoder comes into play. This powerful tool has the ability to translate intricate legal language into plain, easy-to-understand terms, saving both time and money for its users.
With the help of AI Legalese Decoder, individuals and businesses can quickly comprehend a wide range of legal documents, such as contracts, agreements, and other legal texts, without the need for costly legal assistance. By simplifying complex legal documents, this innovative tool empowers its users to make informed decisions and navigate the complexities of the legal system with confidence.
AI Legalese Decoder’s intuitive interface and advanced algorithms ensure that legal jargon is accurately translated into plain language, making it accessible to non-lawyers. This streamlines the process of understanding legal documents, allowing individuals and businesses to focus their time and resources on other important matters.
Additionally, AI Legalese Decoder provides a valuable resource for ensuring that all parties involved fully understand the terms and conditions outlined in legal documents. By breaking down complex legal language, this tool helps to prevent misunderstandings and potential disputes, ultimately contributing to smoother and more efficient business transactions.
In summary, AI Legalese Decoder is a game-changer when it comes to simplifying complex legal documents. Its ability to translate legal jargon into plain language not only saves time and money, but also empowers individuals and businesses to confidently navigate the legal landscape. With its user-friendly interface and accurate translations, AI Legalese Decoder is a valuable tool for anyone seeking to understand and interpret legal documents effectively.
****** just grabbed a
They will use an ‘expert witness’ to calculate your speed based on the frame rate vs. distance travelled. It’s basic maths.
Although any decent lawyer would question the reliability of the camera and ask the expert witness to prove outside of manufacturers alleged specifications that the camera is recording in that frame rate. Which is something I can almost guarantee they wouldn’t have done.
It’s going to cost you considerably and you could quite easily lose.
I see that you have asked people, in 3 other forums, to calculate the distance travelled by a car accelerating to 100km/hr.
Your original post here, claiming 80 km/hr may be less than truthfull.
Whatever you may think about police, those major crash guys know their stuff.
Plenty they can do to ensure itÔÇÖs reliable as others have mentioned. Simplest way is to drive past the camera at the speed theyÔÇÖre alleging, and compare and contrast the footage of them and the footage of you.
Picking two clear points on the footage and measuring the distance, and time taken. Time over distance = speed.
ThereÔÇÖs precedent for using this type of evidence.
They need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt you were speeding at the speed theyÔÇÖre alleging, or risk costs being awarded again them.
TheyÔÇÖre not likely to have had the charges authorised if it was a bit iffy, nor would they waste their time prosecuting you for a simple speeding offence if there wasnÔÇÖt way more to this story.
Obligatory NAL
If they can determine the FPS of the recording and the distance of the camera to the road, then it’s fairly simple maths to work out a very accurate speed using it.
Technically is someone does that math its super accurate. Speed is just distance over time. So if they can measure the space between two locations then track how long it takes for you to go from one to the other then it’s easy to extrapolate speed.
Most don’t because it is a lot of resources but it’s possible. I’m curious what you did to get this attention.
Camera frame-rates are typically very constant, you genuinely were likely doing 100 kmph. Your car does not warp the laws of physics of CCTV cameras, I’d cop the charge.
Op do you have the video ?
It will tell you frame rate and resolution we can make a more accurate assessment of accuracy and precision from that.
When you say ‘charged’ what does that mean? A criminal charge? Or are they just fining you?
If you have dashcam footage with GPS speed reading to support your claims then you might have a chance to dispute it. Otherwise, I expect it will be very difficult.
It’s pretty easy to calculate:
You car will have travelled from Point A to Point B over a given time in sec, which is your actual speed. The reference points (trees, poles etc) can be easily corrected to your car with basic geometry. This information will satisfy the Judge that you were doing a particular speed as you traversed the cameras field of view.
Its a lot more accurate than “I believe I was travelling at less than 80kms.” If you had a drive recorder in your car, or could present GPS information to support your claim, then that may help you case.
If the POPO are charging you, they have good reason to do so and rather than try to wriggle out of if, you ought to face up that you might actually need to make some corrections to your narcissistic ways.
The only way I can see them being wrong is if the distance between the two points they used to calculate your speed was not measure accurately. If you can get the video you can work it out yourself if you go and measure a start and end point. But I’d expect they know what they’re doing since they are professionals in this area.
[removed]
https://www.police.wa.gov.au/Traffic/Cameras/Cameras-work-and-why/Compliance-and-certification
I think it’s worth a lawyer. With some skill – this would probably be a beatable charge given that the ‘evidence’ is an uncalibrated device without certification for such an application. Make them pay your legal fees.
Welcome to r/AusLegal. Please read our rules before commenting. Please remember:
1. Per rule 4, this subreddit is not a replacement for real legal advice. You should independently seek legal advice from a real, qualified practitioner. This sub cannot recommend specific lawyers.
2. A non-exhaustive list of free legal services around Australia can be found here.
3. Links to the each state and territory’s respective Law Society are on the sidebar: you can use these links to find a lawyer in your area.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AusLegal) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Unless the footage had your license plate (i.e., side-on view only) then it could be any car.
I’m assuming the date and time on the recording devices are accurate. The only correlation left is you admitting to being in that area at around that time in a vehicle mostly matching the description.
A lesson learned. Happy Friday!
https://youtu.be/RkN4duV4ia0
DonÔÇÖt ever help anyone ever.
More facts needed. How long was the distance used to measure your speed over? The error decreases with increased distance. How many FPS was the camera shooting at? More FPS equals more accuracy. What was the shutter speed of the camera? Longer shutter speed equals more inaccuracy.
Here is a free motion analysis suite https://physlets.org/tracker/