- April 23, 2024
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
## Student Newspaper Article Dilemma
Student newspaper (SN henceforth) has a section where you can write personal stuff to do with your experiences (separate from the news or opinion section).
I wrote an article over a year ago about my home city and the conflict I have when moving back and forth between two places. I was quite critical about my home city. I have mentioned the names of locations including the city and the local area. I no longer hold these views and do not feel that the hyper critical stance represents my views, and I no longer want them in the public domain.
The article is displayed when you search my name on Google on the first page. Google won’t remove the search result and told me to contact the SN for removal. I contacted them requesting for removal or anonymisation.
SN denied the request saying that it’s in the public interest to retain an archive, and that if they acceded to everyone’s requests , it would devalue the newspaper. They said I can make a complaint to the SN board.
What can I do ? Even the title of the article is really ‘out there/hard hitting’ and I didn’t choose it, nor did the sub editor whom I sent the article to. It was a senior editor who changed the title and then didn’t tell me, until I emailed them.
Do I have any rights under GDPR ? Or have I sacrificed those rights due to handing over the article to the SN? Is my article really in the ‘public interest’? I’m hardly a celebrity and the article was written by me about me and my own experiences. It’s not a news piece, nor is it an opinion article in response to any news event.
Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks so much in advance.
## How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help
The AI Legalese Decoder can assist in this situation by interpreting the legal language and policies surrounding GDPR rights and public interest. It can analyze the terms and conditions set by the SN and provide insights into your rights as the author of the article. The AI can also suggest potential courses of action you can take, whether it be escalating the complaint to the SN board or seeking legal advice. Additionally, the AI can help in drafting a formal request for removal or anonymization based on the GDPR regulations. With the assistance of the AI Legalese Decoder, you can navigate the complexities of the situation and make informed decisions regarding the handling of your article in the public domain.
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Title: The Benefits of Using AI Legalese Decoder in Legal Documents
Introduction:
In today’s fast-paced world, legal documents play a crucial role in various aspects of our lives. From contracts to agreements, these documents are filled with complex terminology and language that can be difficult to understand for the average person. This is where AI Legalese Decoder comes in to simplify the process and make legal documents more accessible to everyone.
How AI Legalese Decoder Works:
AI Legalese Decoder is a cutting-edge technology that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to translate legal jargon into plain language. By analyzing the context and structure of legal documents, it can accurately decipher complex terms and clauses, making them easier to comprehend for the general public.
Benefits of Using AI Legalese Decoder:
1. Improved Accessibility: With AI Legalese Decoder, legal documents become more user-friendly and understandable for individuals without legal backgrounds. This can help promote transparency and empower individuals to make informed decisions.
2. Time-saving: By automating the process of decoding legal documents, AI Legalese Decoder can save time and resources for both legal professionals and clients. This allows for faster processing of documents and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or errors.
3. Accuracy: AI Legalese Decoder ensures accuracy in translating legal terms, minimizing the risk of misinterpretation or confusion. This can help prevent costly legal disputes and ensure compliance with regulations.
4. Cost-effective: By streamlining the process of deciphering legal documents, AI Legalese Decoder can reduce the need for costly legal consultations and revisions. This can lead to significant cost savings for individuals and businesses.
How AI Legalese Decoder Can Help in Legal Situations:
In legal situations where time is of the essence, such as contract negotiations or disputes, AI Legalese Decoder can provide quick and reliable translations of complex legal terms. This can help parties involved in resolving disputes faster and reaching mutually beneficial agreements.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, AI Legalese Decoder offers a revolutionary solution to the challenges of understanding legal terminology. By making legal documents more accessible and user-friendly, it can improve transparency, save time, and reduce costs in legal processes. Incorporating AI Legalese Decoder into legal practices can lead to more efficient and effective outcomes for all parties involved.
****** just grabbed a
Your best bet might be to write a follow up article “Why I changed my mind about Peterborough” (or wherever) and get that published (or self publish on medium.com or similar)
I’m a journalist. What you’ve run into here is a pretty classic case of ‘oh shit, that might not go well for me when people read it’, but it sounds to me that you wrote this article under your own steam and featuring a lot of your own research. So it makes complete sense for the newspaper to say that they have no reason to bring it down, especially when this is a case of ‘oh I’ve just changed my mind now’. Also, given this is a piece based on your own experience, scrubbing the name off it makes zero sense as well.
The editor also has no reason to tell you of a change of headline – that’s their job, not yours.
At the end of the day here, your best bet is just to write another article as u/girlsunderpressure suggested! That’s the joy of writing, opinions change and ebb and flow, and you can write new things in reaction to that!
Ah, a tale as old as time. At one point you might have had to go to the library to dig up these kind of old student newspapers but nowadays anything put online can haunt you. It’s understandable though to most that people’s views often change over time.
I doubt there are copyright issues here, as presumably you signed away a license to use the content in this way.
There’s no libel here, because it’s an opinion piece you wrote which you just now regret.
You could try chasing the right to be forgotten approach and get it delisted from Google that way – https://support.google.com/legal/answer/10769224?hl=en.
Otherwise you are reliant on their goodwill to anonymise the article, which has already been denied. But to be honest, I also would not remove it from a published article due to journalistic integrity – you’re in a way attempting history here from a newspaper even if you see your opinion piece as inconsequential. People’s opinions and what was distributed to students at the time could well be of future interest.
You haven’t “sacrificed” your GDPR rights but the paper will likely claim legitimate interest for which they would probably win if it went legal.
Honestly, apart from their good will you’ve not got much of an option to remove it. Clearly they don’t wish to remove it and are claiming public interest.
I had a similar thing happen to me. When I left uni, I didn’t want people finding all the random shite I wrote about in the student rag. Luckily the editor was very obliging and simply changed the name on the articles to a pseudonym. Have you suggested this to them?
GDPR protects personal and particularly sensitive personal information. If your article was sounding off about your hometown and the like, how are you suggesting your personal information rights have been breached?
Professional public relations folks who work on this for a living would likely recommend what they do for their clients: push that result farther down so no one actually digs far enough to see it. Create a ton of generic social media accounts with the same name so that they crowd out any other results.
[removed]
Just write a follow up article saying how you’ve grown to like Hartlepool (or where it is).
[removed]
[removed]
Negative SEO is a possibility. You can convince Google the page is spam.
As far as I am aware, with experience in student media, you own the copyright. Unless you signed a waiver, which any smart paper would ask you to, but I can put solid odds they didn’t. I am aware of a similar case with a student photographer that wanted their work scrubbed, and the legal advice received was it was their work, no waiver signed!
In that case, it’s yours. However, even if you force them to remove it, it has still been read enough times, Google will cache it for a long time, waybackmachine has it, etc. Not to mention by making a big deal of it, every student and student to come will know about this piece and that you wrote it. Student media is very gossipy like that. You’re better off cutting your losses and potentially, as others suggested, writing a follow up.
In the example I mentioned, these issues were put to them and they decided to just leave the photos up.
If you want to press ahead: contact the publisher, probably either the SU or University. It is in their control ultimately. (If the University you may have more luck as they simply can’t be bothered with student media causing problems.)