- December 10, 2023
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Title: Job Decision Dilemma – Government vs. Not For Profit IT Support Roles
Hey everyone,
I’m seeking some advice on a decision that’s been weighing on my mind lately. I recently received job offers for IT support positions from both a government agency and a not for profit organization. The salary for the not for profit role is 75k with 11% super, while the government job offers 93k with 12.75% super and 17.5% leave loading. The dilemma I’m facing is that the not for profit role allows me to work from home four days a week, while the government job requires a one-hour commute and only allows for three days of remote work per fortnight after the probation period.
Despite the salary difference, the government job guarantees regular pay raises and offers the opportunity to work alongside a cloud team, providing valuable exposure to cloud technologies. However, it also involves site visits and requires me to serve as an escalation point, while the not for profit position does not involve service desk tasks or sitting on the phone.
The allure of a higher salary and potential for significant career growth with the government job is undeniable, but the flexibility and work-life balance offered by the not for profit role are equally important to me.
How can AI Legalese Decoder help with the situation?
AI Legalese Decoder can provide clarity by analyzing the employment contracts and legal documents associated with each job offer, helping me better understand the terms, benefits, and potential limitations of each position. It can also assist in assessing the long-term implications of the decision, such as the impact on work-life balance, career advancement opportunities, and overall job satisfaction. By using AI Legalese Decoder, I can make a well-informed decision that aligns with both my professional and personal goals.
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Original Content:
AI Legalese Decoder is a tool that uses artificial intelligence to simplify and translate complex legal jargon into plain language. It can help legal professionals, businesses, and individuals understand contracts, terms of service, and other legal documents more easily.
Rewritten Content:
AI Legalese Decoder: A Revolutionary Tool for Simplifying Legal Jargon
In today’s fast-paced and complex legal environment, it’s more important than ever for legal professionals, businesses, and individuals to be able to understand and interpret legal documents. However, the use of dense and complex legal language can often create barriers to comprehension and can lead to misinterpretations and misunderstandings.
AI Legalese Decoder is a cutting-edge tool that leverages the power of artificial intelligence to simplify and translate complex legal jargon into plain and understandable language. This innovative tool is designed to help legal professionals, businesses, and individuals more easily navigate through contracts, terms of service, and other legal documents.
By offering a simplified and user-friendly interface, AI Legalese Decoder enables users to input legal documents and receive a clear and concise translation of the content. This can be particularly valuable for legal professionals who need to quickly review and understand the terms of a contract, or for businesses and individuals who want to ensure that they are fully informed about the implications of a particular legal document.
Moreover, AI Legalese Decoder can be used to identify potential legal pitfalls and ambiguities in contracts and other legal documents, thereby helping to prevent costly misunderstandings and legal disputes. By providing a clear and accurate translation of legal jargon, this tool can save time and resources for legal professionals, businesses, and individuals.
Overall, AI Legalese Decoder is a game-changing tool that has the potential to revolutionize the way legal documents are understood and interpreted. Its intuitive and user-friendly interface, combined with the power of artificial intelligence, makes it an invaluable resource for anyone who deals with legal language on a regular basis.
In conclusion, AI Legalese Decoder is a must-have tool for legal professionals, businesses, and individuals who want to navigate the complex world of legal jargon with confidence and ease. Its ability to simplify and translate complex legal language into plain and understandable terms makes it an indispensable asset for anyone who deals with legal documents on a regular basis. By using AI Legalese Decoder, users can save time and resources, while also reducing the risk of misunderstandings and legal disputes.
****** just grabbed a
Take the govt job. Your wage is still low, its not worth leaving 20k on the table to WFH when you on that rate. It also sounds like this will be a challenging role for you and it will benefit your learning being in the office. When you get to 130K+, then you can make that choice but will probably find that you won’t even have to make a sacrifice to WFH.
Does the NFP have the opportunity to salary sacrifice using the FBT Exemption for public beneficiary institutions? That may help move the dial on your decision as you could access benefits tax free.
Nope, not when thereÔÇÖs so many companies offering WFH (and at competitive rates).
Edit: I read your post. Take the government job, because once you are in government it is very to move around between departments, then just apply for departments that have better WFH policies.
I work in a factory so no, the neighbours would complain.
NFP often donÔÇÖt have a lot of $ to throw around. So they often donÔÇÖt end up good places to work. Maintaining old equipment or not spending money to fix obvious things.
What’s the commute like? I’m pretty close to a train station, so if it’s one direct train I can take then I’d do it because at least I can sleep or do other stuff while I’m commuting. But if it’s requires different modes of public transport or if I had to drive and pay for parking, then I’d be leaning towards the other role.
LetÔÇÖs work this out.
WFH role: $83,250 package
Other role: round it up to $105k package, so $21,750 up.
A yearly PT pass (using Melbourne as an example): $1950, so would still be $19,800 up.
Only you can decide for yourself whatÔÇÖs better for you, but the question would be is WFH worth $20,000 per year?
High level based off what you’ve said, the government role sounds like a better growth opportunity, but you might want to consider moving / share housing closer to the job to cut down the commute?
Here’s a brain dump… ymmv, I’m about 15 years in working with a msft stack across NFP, private & gov roles, azure cloud for the last 8ish years – most of that contract.
For perspective, I’m currently 100% WFH, working gov contracts. Day rates nationwide for most azure skillsets sit $1-1.5k/day incl, with WFH %’s depending on department and state/territory. If you’re interested in pursuing that path, I’d suggest it’s a 5 year plan where you pick career progression to maximise exposure and move every 2-3 years to get more experience – but sounds like you have the right entry level jobs to start towards it.
I’d take whichever gives you better resume experience for the next couple years, because it’s about setting your career up for life – it’s not about this job. eg – I’ve done several transitions from on-prem to cloud, and they were all different – a lot of growth opportunity there, and ability to put your hand up and get exposure to new things. If it’s coming in to support an existing platform and you’re mostly support, I suspect a lot less. Don’t stay anywhere longer than 2-3 years full stop – no-one will promote you / pay you competitively for your growth, and you won’t learn as quickly as you can – again, it’s ultimately about getting exposure for more senior roles.
Government :
My experience with government is what state of maturity you walk into is wildly variable, but a downside that they don’t change quickly – it’s very much a set in stone “we do it this way” – so there’s often a limit to how much you can grow once you’ve mastered the requirements of your role. Plus side, you can second around freely, get exposure to other government roles and learn a lot that way – and other departments may use things differently, so you can still get more exposure to tech there and FTE roles for the first few years in government are competitive salary (more senior roles you’d want to be contract, or private will be better money). Government rarely has crunch until you get a lot higher up (anything the ministers office asks for etc). I’m not sure if it’s an outlier because of the areas I’ve worked in (law enforcement & healthcare), but the managers I’ve had mostly genuinely cared about the work we do, and helping people grow in their roles.
Private :
I personally hate the QoL working private – unpaid overtime, crunch etc – the cultures vary, but it’s hard to predict from outside the organisation. I won’t take these roles anymore, unless I know someone working in the team I’d be joining. I’ve had much more randomness with good and bad managers, and companies I loved working for turn sour because of one manager change – I guess this can happen elsewhere, but with NFP/Government cultures seem to be more steady.
NFP :
Least experience I have of the lot, but great QoL for the time I’ve done with them – seem to largely care about growing their people etc. Similar to government with more appetite for change. If you can find well compensated work in NFP (including fringe benefit shenanigans) I’d consider them.
What state? Government roles in Victoria are 3 days in office, 2 WFH, so your 3 days a fortnight is a bit on the low side.
But once probation is up, you might find your team only goes in 3 days per week, or not even. Add in ÔÇ£too sick to work in the officeÔÇØ days and it all adds up.
IÔÇÖm in government and just getting over Covid so I havenÔÇÖt been into the office for a fortnight.
IÔÇÖd go government over NFP purely for the career advancements.
Not for profit role probably means salary packaging so potentially ask the employer about this. You could package either $9,010 or $15,900 + $2,650 entertainment per year so your $75k could potentially be in the range of $80-85k comparable to a non salary packaging role. (Salary packaging you potentially reduce your taxable income so your take home pay is the equivalent of $80-85k gross salary)
Find out the salary packaging component and then see what the comparison is with take home pay and then see if WFH 4 days a week works versus 1.5 days a week.
Consider asking the NFP employer if they have an employment agreement to see their potential pay rises also.
Congrats and all the best.
No. The cost of travel to the office is never factored into your salary unless you negotiate a higher wage at the start. Also I reckon you spend more at home in electricity both on air-conditioning in summer, and heating in winter. I know it’s claimable, etc, but if my output is the same in an office or at home, I don’t see why a cut is needed. Not to mention, I’m saving the company office space costs, so in the end, the company will always win by having staff at home…if staff perform, of course, and don’t bludge.
IÔÇÖd work 3 days a fortnight from home if that was the offer. I am currently only making 65k + super though, so thatÔÇÖs a significant increase which drives me towards saying yes to the government job.
Currently working hybrid (3 WFH – 2 WFO).
Only YOU know whatÔÇÖs best for you and your situation. Is it really worth give or take 20k for 4 days WFH?
$20k extra to work 1 more day a week at work, seems like a no brainer
It costs me $7k to work from the office 3 days a week (childcare, petrol, tolls, takeaway) plus I cry myself awake almost every day.
Im praying for another pandemic, honestly.
What are your hobbies? Can any of them be done on public transport? i.e reading, podcasts, netflix. To many people treat a 1 hour commute like you have to stare at a wall the whole time.
I work from home, have done for 6 years. Don’t do it, it’s incredibly isolating & has severely affected my mental health.
I’d take the Gov role for 12 months, then use that experience to land a role with another company that is remote or mostly WFH for better pay.
I’d expect a pay increase to cover myself buying my own snacks, breakfast, fruits and frinks (free at work, FAANG place) plus cost of electricity and internet which I also pay for while WFH. I’d say extra $10,000 a year or 50 AMZN shares annually with immediate vesting would do
why would I take a pay cut to work from home when I’m doing the same amount of work, in fact most studies say I’d be doing more?
Take the gov job. Those aren’t very high wages, you need the money going into your super and WFH 3 days a fortnight is still really good tbh.
Not for profit will have salary sacrifice so thats something you should weigh up.
No because the cost of home purchased or rental has become fundamentally more expensive. If anything the companies should be paying us MORE as weÔÇÖre shouldering the cost office space, electricity, etc.
Assuming the work is roughly equal you should definitely take the WFH NFP role.
The salary sacrifice saves you an extra 6k in tax per year.
2 hours a day or 10 hours a week less in commuting, you are paid roughly $43.89 per hour which means the extra 10 hours is with $438.9 per week or $21067 per year.
Plus you don’t have to listen to the Karen’s in the office say “who has the time”.
Nice try boss.
IÔÇÖd def go the govt job over the not for profit. The extra money will give you better choices ultimately. Too much working from home can become staid and isolated.
It does depend on how long your commute is and how much you value your time, but youÔÇÖre leaving over 20k a year on the table to WFH. Unless your commute is like 2hrs each way. thatÔÇÖs probably too much.
WFH is great, honestly. I think IÔÇÖd be tempted to do it. Could you try negotiate with the NFP?
Also.. (after tax)
I believe 93k is 64,000 take home pay
And 75k is 53,000 take home pay
I could be wrong, of course.
Government jobs are really good, and once youÔÇÖve worked with one gov, really helps you work with any other branch in gov – and thereÔÇÖs a lot.
Do they have a 9 day working week?
No. If my output and quality are the same, if I work the same hours, why would I need to take a pay cut?
I get pay in return for output, not just for my bum on a seat in an office.
I pay $160 a month to travel into the city for work.
I would take exactly that much of a pay cut to work from home.
Working from home also has expenses associated either with it so that reduces the wages. IÔÇÖd recommend taking a government job all day, itÔÇÖs the most secure.
For 20k difference you should not hesitate. Too much work from home will ends up job going to overseas. My company is doing that right now.
Taking salary and work location out of the equation if take the job which would benefit me in 3, 5, years time. Where I could be potentially be earning double if I make the right choice. Government departments have much larger tech requirements so exposure to cloud and risks, cyber sec controls would be much higher
Think longer term. Which job gives you the best prospects for your next move to get you to the dream job? It might be decided by the experience youÔÇÖll get or getting you closer to the salary level you are looking for.
My gut feeling is that working from home only works as a long term career move if you are already where you want to be. ItÔÇÖs harder to impress people beyond your immediate boss when you work from home.
As someone who works on the cloud vendor side and have worked with both gov and charity orgs- take the gov one – charity will be tight AF and you’ll be firefighting all day. Once you get up there in salary/ experience you can go vendor-land or private sector for 2x money
Starting out, you really want exposure to a broad range of work and talented people to help you grow. Normally I would say take the WFH but the gov role seems like excellent experience.
No Brainer for me….Gov’t Job
Should get paid more to work from home. As costs are transferred from the workplace to you personally.
This is of course subjective.
I do love this type of question though.
Some jobs can be done from home (Eg: office type work)
Sone jobs canÔÇÖt (like medical/nursing type work)
This then creates a divide between many people as those that canÔÇÖt can be jealous/etc towards those that can creating a negative point of view on this.
Then there is the ÔÇÿworkplace is their social life-mental health booster. Water cooler conversations. Social interactions, etc. And thus they want to not work from home. Aldo working from home isnÔÇÖt a cake walk for all. Some people prefer the structure of workplace pace of life.
Finally we have the group that can and want to work from home. Sone because they donÔÇÖt thrive of workplace culture and social aspects.
We also, within this group, have factors like: time to work (the longer it takes the more they want to work from home); coast to commute (again like time to work but with money spent); and then there are other costs and loss of peopleÔÇÖs person time: kids needing yo be collected/droppes off, and looked after; partner and family times together; spare time lost from commutes; parking, petrol, need for a car, etc.
Over time this is likely to become more and more common to work from home. But first the structure of society and business needs a shift for it to be better achieved and attractive to most.
Just remember.. we use to all work from home at certain times in history. Modernisation changed this.
DO NOT RESPONSE WITH YES
They will send you home with a pay cut then 3 months later call you back to the office on same paycut
I don’t understand how you can get a lower rem number because you work from home. You aren’t doing any less work. It’s costing the company less to employ you.
I wouldn’t work for a company that offered me that.
I worked from home for no less money, in fact I got large pay rises over the years of wfh, but, ultimately, once the pandemic was over, they wanted us back in the office more and I began to realise that I was spending around 40hrs a month commuting to the office. (This was also an I.T Support type role). In the end, I accepted a redundancy and now (luckily I had a trade behind me) I am back on the tools of my trade, for a local company where I never work more than 20mins from home, have a company vehicle and am home by 3:30 every day. Sure, the hourly rate is quite less than it was in I.T, but the trade off was worth it for me.
Can you salary sacrifice at the NFP? That’s like a $10000 payrise in itself.
I am a software developer. If you are young, my advice would be to look where you can gain most experience. My experience is that you can get lot more exposure in private sector.
This was a good read.
Here is what I think
Great article! AI Legalese Decoder seems like a valuable tool for anyone needing to understand complex legal jargon. It can definitely help in making well-informed decisions, just like in the job decision dilemma mentioned in the article.
Thanks, Ely Shemer