- October 3, 2023
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
Heading: Dentist’s Unfair Treatment and Falsification of Dental Records: Seeking Justice and Support from AI Legalese Decoder
Introduction:
My relative comes to you today to recount a distressing incident involving her dentist, which has left her feeling outraged and deceived. This account will shed light on the dentist’s attempt to make her pay for private treatment, her email complaint against this unethical practice, and the subsequent falsification of her dental notes. Amidst these injustices, we will explore how AI Legalese Decoder can provide crucial assistance and guidance throughout this ordeal.
Background:
During a routine visit, the dentist informed my relative that she needed to see a hygienist for gum treatment, for which she would be charged £70 every three months. Arguing that she qualifies for free treatment due to her low-income status and benefits, my relative encountered resistance from both the receptionist and the dentist, who adamantly insisted on the need for private treatment.
The Email Complaint:
Seeking recourse, my relative composed an email to address her concerns. She eloquently conveyed that if the dentist believed her gums required a scale and polish for clinical reasons, then she should be entitled to the same treatment through the National Health Service (NHS) without any additional charges. Conversely, if no clinical necessity existed, she urged the dentist to document this explicitly in her dental record.
The Dentist’s Deception:
Alarming developments soon unfolded as my relative’s complaint rattled the dentist, prompting the practice manager to respond with a dishonest statement a week later. Shockingly, the dental notes manipulated by the dentist falsely asserted that my relative had declined the offer for a free NHS scale and polish, citing her concerns about excessively long waiting times. However, there was no truth to these claims, as no such conversation ever took place.
Suspicions of Widespread Deception:
The evidence presented strongly suggests an alarming pattern of deceit practiced by both the dentist and the receptionist, as they seem intent on collecting fees from unsuspecting NHS patients or leaving them untreated. This leads my relative to wonder if she should take further action against this unethical behavior. However, she remained skeptical of the potential outcomes and questioned whether it is worth her time and effort.
The Importance of Reporting:
Despite securing the referral for the necessary scale and polish eventually, my relative cannot escape a lingering sense of guilt for not pursuing consequences against the dishonest dentist and receptionist. She eagerly seeks advice on whether it is worthwhile to report these individuals and if any meaningful action can be expected in response.
AI Legalese Decoder’s Role:
In this complex situation, we can turn to AI Legalese Decoder for invaluable assistance. This innovative technological tool can analyze and interpret the intricacies of legal jargon, guiding my relative on the appropriate course of action. Utilizing advanced algorithms, AI Legalese Decoder can provide a comprehensive understanding of her rights as a patient, potential avenues for reporting, and the probability of tangible outcomes. By employing this cutting-edge resource, my relative can navigate the legal landscape with certainty and clarity, ensuring her efforts are not in vain.
Conclusion:
This distressing experience highlights the audacious attempt by a dentist to charge for unnecessary private treatment and subsequent falsification of dental records. While my relative eventually obtained her referral, her concerns about the unethical behaviors of the dentist and receptionist persist. With the potential support and guidance offered by AI Legalese Decoder, she can confidently explore reporting options and determine the most effective measures to address this recurring fraud. Through collective efforts, it is imperative to hold accountable those who exploit and deceive vulnerable patients within the healthcare system.
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
AI Legalese Decoder: Simplifying Legal Jargon for Everyday Use
Introduction:
Legal documents and contracts are notorious for their complex and impenetrable language, known as legalese. This linguistic style, consisting of archaic terms and convoluted sentence structures, often poses a significant barrier to understanding for the general public. As a result, individuals without legal expertise frequently struggle to comprehend the contents of legal texts, hindering their ability to navigate important agreements and protect their rights. However, with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, a solution to this problem has emerged – the AI Legalese Decoder.
Increased accessibility and understanding:
The AI Legalese Decoder is an innovative tool that employs natural language processing algorithms to simplify and decode legal jargon. By utilizing advanced linguistic analysis, this AI system breaks down complex terms and phrases into more digestible language, allowing individuals to grasp the intended meaning of legal documents with ease. Furthermore, the decoder employs machine learning capabilities, constantly evolving and adapting to generate even more accurate translations over time.
Enhancing legal literacy:
One of the key advantages offered by the AI Legalese Decoder is its ability to enhance legal literacy among non-legal professionals. By providing clear and concise translations of legal texts, individuals can gain a better understanding of their rights and obligations, empowering them to make more informed decisions. Whether it’s understanding the terms of a rental agreement or comprehending the intricacies of a business contract, this AI tool equips users with the knowledge they need to navigate legal complexities effectively.
Simplifying legal processes:
The AI Legalese Decoder not only benefits individuals but also streamlines legal processes for businesses and institutions. By removing the need for time-consuming consultations with lawyers or legal experts, this tool enables companies to save both time and money. Moreover, it reduces the chances of misunderstandings and disputes arising from misinterpretation of contracts, ensuring smoother negotiations and collaborations.
Mitigating risks and errors:
Misunderstanding legal documents can have serious consequences, potentially resulting in financial loss or legal disputes. However, the AI Legalese Decoder mitigates these risks by translating legalese into plain, understandable language. This ensures that all parties involved clearly comprehend the terms and conditions of their agreements, reducing the likelihood of costly errors or disputes that could have otherwise arisen due to misunderstandings.
Conclusion:
The AI Legalese Decoder presents a game-changing solution for the general public when it comes to understanding legal documents. By harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and natural language processing, this tool is bridging the gap between complicated legalese and everyday comprehension. Its ability to enhance legal literacy, simplify processes, and reduce risks makes it an invaluable asset in today’s increasingly complex legal landscape. With the AI Legalese Decoder, legal texts are no longer an impenetrable wall, but rather a comprehensible resource for everyone.
****** just grabbed a
A scale and polish on the NHS is a ÔÇÿsuperficialÔÇÖ 5 minute clean to remove visible plaque/tartar. A 30 minute private hygiene appointment involves cleaning below the gum line to help prevent conditions such as periodontitis. You can have a deep clean ÔÇÿperioÔÇÖ appointment on the NHS which attracts a band 2 charge of ┬ú70.70. An NHS dentist will only recommend one of these if your teeth are in particularly bad condition. I imagine your dentist like all NHS dentists is under financial and time constraints so recommending a hygienist visit made more sense.
However – a dentist should NEVER lie in their clinical notes. ThatÔÇÖs a huge no no, so definitely write a complaint to the manager and ask them to investigate. You can also request a copy of your notes at any time by asking for a subject access request. Depending on the system the dentist used it should time and date stamp when the notes were written.
No one ÔÇ£needsÔÇØ a basic scale every three months. You may need periodontal therapy which is more than just a scale and is indicated if you have gum disease – if that is the case then 3 monthly is the recommended recall interval until your disease is stabilised. Perio treatment falls under the NHS band 2 which is ┬ú70.70 per course of treatment. If an NHS patient requires a simple scale I do it during their check up appointment. There is no clinical requirement for anyone to have a polish though as stain removal is cosmetic and therefore not essential for dental health – the NHS needs to alter the wording because scale and polish is a very outdated term but I digress. I suspect there have been some crossed wires here.
I would report your dental surgery to the relevant boards, I think there’s a few that are applicable. You can also complain to local NHS Trust.
It may be worth asking for your dental records after each treatment, so they can’t edit it after the fact. Ask for a printed, signed and dated copy.
[removed]
Absolutely report them.
Maybe you’re the first person to report them, and nothing much comes of it.
Maybe you’re not the first. Or maybe someone reports them in the future. And suddenly there’s a pattern that then gets investigated.
If everyone thought “Ah, it worked out for me, I’ll just let it go” then nothing would ever get done about it.
[removed]
You can complain to the General Dental council about this as well as the NHS. ItÔÇÖs unlawful for them to do this. I could get a Subject Access Request and ask for when these files were last modified and when they were last updated. So the when the information was added. You can ask for it.
[removed]
[removed]
Clinical need and good idea because youÔÇÖre an adult are different things.
Clinical need means if thereÔÇÖs active disease and is covered by the nhs. If you just have a lot of build up but no active disease then it is just a good idea to have it removed before active disease occurs-but the nhs wonÔÇÖt cover this.
Most adults should be seeing a hygienist regularly anyway-itÔÇÖs part of being responsible for your health.
And yea a hygienist will do a clean far better than a dentist. We have very little training in gum disease/hygiene because the bulk of our training goes into the more skilled procedures.
Yes you should be entitled to the treatment but there will probably be a long wait. However, once started you should get it every three months.
I’d go back and be extra polite and just state what you’d like. Practice managers are usually pretty OK.
[removed]
[removed]
Ask for the audit trail on your notes. It will show this was written after the complaint.
[removed]
Are you registered there as an NHS patient?
NAL but if you are concerned and able to switch I would attempt to do so. Although it is incredibly difficult to find a NHS dentist.
Maybe ask citizens advice on the matter and file a formal complaint stating that the notes do not accurately reflect the conversation.
[removed]
As well as reporting to the dental council also use what ever process they have to report a ÔÇÿdata breachÔÇÖ under GDPR. Tell them that your information has been inaccurately edited and you require it to be corrected. You could also use a subject access request to request a copy of your notes time stamped after your appointment but before you complaint – and then again after your complaint to see if there was a backwards edit. If there was then this would potentially be fraud.
If they tell you they donÔÇÖt have this information they are lying. Medical records are 100% audited for when changes are made and are not able to be deleted, any changes will be tracked and previously deleted entries viewable.
That is all assuming they actually did what you are saying and it wasnÔÇÖt just a misunderstanding
[removed]