Instantly Interpret Free: Legalese Decoder – AI Lawyer Translate Legal docs to plain English

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

## Introduction
California lawmakers have revived legislation to charge online platforms for the news articles they publish, a proposal that stalled last year amid divisions within the journalism industry and intense opposition from Google and other tech companies. The new amendments published Monday to Assembly Bill 886 aim to address concerns from small publishers and make the plan more similar to the way Canada charges platforms for distributing news content.

## How AI legalese decoder Can Help
AI legalese decoder can assist in understanding the complex legal language used in Assembly Bill 886 and provide insights on how the proposed legislation may impact digital advertising giants and news outlets. By decoding the bill’s language, users can gain a clearer understanding of the proposed fees and regulations for online platforms.

## Proposed Changes in the Bill
The bill, also known as the “California Journalism Preservation Act,” mandates that digital advertising giants pay news outlets a fee when they sell advertising alongside news content. Publishers would need to allocate 70% of these funds to pay journalists in California. The amendments suggest calculating payments based on the number of journalists employed by a news outlet, similar to Canada’s model. Additionally, a fund would be created into which platforms pay, and the money would then be distributed to news outlets. For instance, Google is currently contributing $74 million annually to a fund in Canada for the news industry.

## Impact on Small Publishers
The new amendments in Assemblymember Buffy Wicks’ bill provide a boost to small publishers by making them eligible for funding beyond the per-journalist payout. They would also have more flexibility in how they spend the received money by reducing the portion required to be spent on paying journalists to 50%.

## Reaction and Potential Further Changes
The bill is sponsored by the California News Publishers Assn., with publishers advocating for compensation for their work. While the amendments have been made, further modifications are likely as negotiations progress. The bill is scheduled for a hearing on June 25 in the Senate Judiciary Committee, and State Sen. Tom Umberg anticipates more changes as negotiations continue.

## Additional Legislation
Another bill, Senate Bill 1327, is seeking to aid the journalism industry by imposing a new tax on Amazon, Meta, and Google for the data they collect from users. The funds from this “data extraction mitigation fee” would be directed towards news organizations. State Sen. Steve Glazer believes his bill aligns with Wicks’ legislation and remains optimistic about finding solutions to support the journalism industry amidst various challenges.

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Reference link