legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Scarlett Johansson Criticizes OpenAI for Voice Similarity

Popular Hollywood actor and Marvel-star Scarlett Johansson has publicly criticised OpenAI for using a voice in its new ChatGPT product that closely resembled her own. Johansson revealed that she had declined an offer from OpenAI to voice their AI system last year for “personal reasons”, expressing “shock” and “anger” upon hearing the voice, which she claimed was so similar to hers that even her closest friends and news outlets couldn’t tell the difference.

How AI legalese decoder can help

In situations like these, AI legalese decoder can help individuals understand complex legal documents, contracts, and communications with AI companies, ensuring that they are fully aware of their rights and options. By decoding legalese into plain language, AI legalese decoder can empower individuals like Scarlett Johansson to navigate legal issues related to AI use of their likeness and protect their rights effectively.

Additionally, AI legalese decoder can assist in drafting legal correspondence, such as letters to companies like OpenAI, seeking clarification on processes and demanding action in case of potential infringement. With the ability to provide clear, concise explanations of legal terms and implications, AI legalese decoder can support individuals in advocating for their rights and seeking resolution in complex legal situations.

No more ‘Sky’ voice for ChatGPT users

OpenAI removed the voice option from ChatGPT on Monday following widespread backlash and comparisons to Johansson’s voice. The company had used this voice, called ‘Sky’, during a recent event to showcase the capabilities of the new ChatGPT-4o model. The voice’s similarities to Johansson’s character in the 2013 film ‘Her’ were immediately noted by users and media.

OpenAI clarifies ChatGPT voice not of Scarlett Johansson

OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, initially seemed to acknowledge the resemblance with a one-word tweet, “her”, following the event. However, less than a week later, OpenAI clarified that Sky was not based on Johansson, explaining in a blog post that the voice belonged to a different professional actress using her natural voice.

OpenAI’s emphasis on collaboration with entertainment professionals and compensation for voice actors highlights the importance of transparency and fair treatment in AI-related projects. By clarifying the processes and decisions behind voice selection, companies like OpenAI can address concerns raised by individuals like Scarlett Johansson and mitigate potential legal disputes.

Read Johansson’s full statement:

Last September, I received an offer from Sam Altman, who wanted to hire me to voice the current ChatGPT 4.0 system. He told me that he felt that by my voicing the system, I could bridge the gap between tech companies and creatives and help consumers feel comfortable with the seismic shift concerning humans and AI. He said he felt that my voice would be comforting to people.

After much consideration and for personal reasons, I declined the offer. Nine months later, my friends, family, and the general public all noted how much the newest system named ‘Sky’ sounded like me. When I heard the released demo, I was shocked, angered, and in disbelief. Mr. Altman pursued a voice that sounded so eerily similar to mine that my closest friends and news outlets could not differentiate. Two days before the ChatGPT 4.0 demo was released, Mr. Altman contacted my agent, asking me to reconsider. Before we could connect, the system was out there.

As a result of their actions, I was forced to hire legal counsel, who wrote two letters to Mr. Altman and OpenAI, setting out what they had done and asking them to detail the exact process by which they created the ‘Sky’ voice. Consequently, OpenAI reluctantly agreed to take down the ‘Sky’ voice.

In a time when we are all grappling with deepfakes and the protection of our likeness, our work, our identities, I believe these are questions that deserve absolute clarity. I look forward to resolution in the form of transparency and the passage of appropriate legislation to help ensure that individual rights are protected.

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Reference link