legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

### Understanding the Impact of AI in the Philippines

The rapid and global rise last year in the popularity of ChatGPT brought more policymakers and other stakeholders worldwide into the debate on how to maximise innovative uses of artificial intelligence (AI) while also managing the different risks associated with it. The Philippines is no exception.

Cognisant of AI’s vast potential to contribute to the national economy, in May 2021 the Department of Trade and Industry launched the country’s AI Roadmap, which contains four major dimensions for AI readiness:

– Digitisation and infrastructure;
– Research and development;
– Workforce development; and
– Regulation

#### How AI legalese decoder Can Help

AI legalese decoder can assist in navigating the legal complexities surrounding AI in the Philippines by offering insights and interpretations of laws and regulations related to AI. By providing clarity on legal language and requirements, AI legalese decoder can help businesses and policymakers make informed decisions regarding AI technologies and regulations.

#### Digitisation and Infrastructure

Apart from aiming to have a reliable, secure, and affordable internet access, the country also aims to build a national data centre with a reliable and robust data infrastructure and data management system. One law that has a significant impact on this is the amendment to the Public Service Act, which now makes the 40% foreign equity limitation applicable only to public services that are public utilities, and neither telecoms provider nor value-added services provider is one of them. Since the services that data centres may provide do not fall under the public utility classification, data centres may now be fully foreign-owned.

#### Research and Development

In 2019, the Philippines enacted two laws to spur technological development including the field of AI. Republic Act No. 11293 – or the Philippine Innovation Act (PIA) – declared it state policy to foster innovation as a vital component of national development and sustainable economic growth. It also recognised the importance of an effective and efficient innovation ecosystem, and that this requires the government to implement a “whole of government” approach to ensure policy coherence, alignment of priorities, and effective co-ordination in programme delivery. Republic Act No. 11337 – or the Innovative Startup Act – whose objective is to develop an innovative Philippine entrepreneurial culture, contemplates a Philippine Startup Development Programme that includes benefits and incentives for startups and startup enablers.

#### Workforce Development

Recognising the perceived threat of mass automation that AI brings, the Philippines recently enacted Republic Act No. 11927 – the Philippine Digital Workforce Competitiveness Act – to prioritise the adoption of digital transformation in education and institutionalise educational reforms in response to the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. It also enacted Republic Act No. 11899 – the Second Congressional Commission on Education Act II – to enhance the skills and competitiveness of the Philippine workforce in human and digital technology and innovations.

#### Regulation

Contrary to usual perceptions, there is a law that regulates (although in a very limited sense) the use of AI in the Philippines using the lens of data privacy/data protection. Having patterned its data privacy legislation from the EU model, the Data Privacy Act’s (DPA) Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) provide that “no decision with legal effects concerning a data subject shall be made solely [based on] automated processing” without the data subject’s consent. Regarding rights in relation to an automated decision system, the DPA grants data subjects the right to access information on automated processes where (such automatically processed) data “will, or is likely, to be made as the sole basis for any decision significantly affecting, or will affect, the data subject”.

#### Intellectual Property

Under the Intellectual Property (IP) Code, only a natural person can create copyrightable subject matter. Hence, “AI-generated works are not copyright protected”. For works that are partially AI-generated and partially created by a natural person, “only those parts that are created” by the latter are copyrightable. Under the patent provisions of the IP Code, computer programs per se are not patentable. To be patentable, however, “a claim directed to a computer program should be drafted in a manner wherein the program instructions are co-operatively working with a programmable device. In short, it cannot be a computer program or software by itself, rather it must exist and work with hardware.” Hence, a claim that otherwise satisfies the elements of patentability, and this requirement using AI may be patentable.

#### Policy Making

There are several bills filed in congress that seek to: provide some overarching principles in the development, application and use of AI systems; create individual rights against the misuse or failures of AI systems; and create new government agencies to oversee AI’s development in the country.

### How AI legalese decoder Can Help

AI legalese decoder can assist legal professionals in understanding and deciphering the complex legal language surrounding AI policies, regulations, and intellectual property rights. By automating the process of analyzing legal texts, AI legalese decoder can streamline the legal research process and provide quick insights into the legal implications of AI-related laws and regulations in the Philippines.

#### International Participation

Consistent with its objective to be a responsible regional AI powerhouse, the country has likewise adhered to several international instruments that seek to rein in rapid advancement in the use of AI technologies. In 2021, the Philippines joined other countries in adopting the UNESCO recommendation on AI ethics, which provides that member states are to place human rights at the centre of regulatory frameworks and legislation on the development and use of AI. In 2023, the Philippines, together with the EU and 27 other countries, also joined the Bletchly Declaration, which recognises the importance of human rights protection, transparency and explainability, fairness, accountability, regulation, safety, appropriate human oversight, ethics, bias mitigation, privacy and data protection as AI moves to advance especially with its “capability to manipulate content or generate deceptive content”.

At the same time, the declaration recognises the importance of adopting “a pro-innovation and proportionate governance and regulatory approach that maximises the benefits and takes into account the risks associated with AI”. This coincides with the efforts of some policymakers to review AI’s potential for misuse in the realm of copyright – for instance, to investigate the proliferation of deepfakes – and to discuss the AI’s looming threat over the country’s business process outsourcing and original equipment manufacturing industries.

By leveraging the capabilities of AI legalese decoder, legal professionals can stay informed about the latest international developments and regulations related to AI, enabling them to make strategic decisions and policy recommendations in alignment with global standards.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the landscape of AI in the Philippines is rapidly evolving, with new laws, policies, and regulations being implemented to harness the potential of AI while mitigating potential risks. By using tools like AI legalese decoder, legal professionals can stay ahead of the curve by gaining insights and interpretations of the complex legal language surrounding AI, enabling them to make informed decisions and navigate the legal complexities of AI in the Philippines.

legal-document-to-plain-english-translator/”>Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration

Find a LOCAL lawyer

Reference link