Significant Senate Vote on IRS Broker Reporting Rules: What It Means for the Cryptocurrency Industry

Last week, the Senate’s decisive vote to repeal the IRS’s decentralized finance broker reporting rule marks a pivotal moment for the cryptocurrency industry. This follows a similar vote from the House earlier last month, and together these developments signify shifting attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation. Many in the industry have been wary of these reporting rules for decentralized finance (DeFi) brokers, concerned that the compliance costs could stifle innovation and growth. However, while this vote may seem like a victory, it also underscores an ongoing regulatory gap for DeFi that remains unaddressed.

These platforms, operating beyond the purview of traditional financial scrutiny, are not subject to know-your-customer (KYC) regulations or formalized information reporting. This creates a substantial data void for regulators who need insight into the taxable income and reporting obligations of cryptocurrency investors engaging in trades on decentralized exchanges. Consequently, crypto investors are left grappling with the additional responsibility of tracking, calculating, and appropriately reporting their taxable income earned from DeFi transactions. Effective recordkeeping, combined with reliable crypto tax software, will be essential for investors navigating this complex environment—this necessity will continue until policymakers can devise and implement comprehensive DeFi compliance laws.

Current Reporting Framework and Its Implications

The Section 6045 broker reporting regulations applicable to U.S. custodial exchanges remain intact despite this setback for DeFi reporting. Beginning in 2026, any taxpayers who engage in selling, trading, or exchanging digital assets via centralized exchanges such as Coinbase or Kraken will be issued a Form 1099-DA detailing their taxable exchanges for the previous tax year (2025). Although this development may feel like a relief for crypto clients, the complexity of accurate reporting persists.

To complicate matters, during the 2025 tax year, cost-basis reporting will not be mandated. This means that taxpayers can expect to receive 1099-DAs focusing solely on gross proceeds from transactions while being solely responsible for calculating their tax basis and realized gains. Moreover, when cost-basis reporting commences in the 2026 tax year, it is unlikely to alleviate the concerns of numerous active crypto traders. This is due to the regulation stipulating that cost basis will apply only to digital assets purchased and retained exclusively on designated exchanges. Investors choosing to utilize self-custody options through crypto wallets, including hardware wallets, will still face the same challenges of arriving at unreported tax basis and ambiguous gains.

The Necessity of Compliance Solutions

Due to the phased implementation of Section 6045 broker reporting, as well as existing regulatory gaps concerning assets transferred off-platform, investors remain responsible for diligently tracking, reporting, and validating their cost basis. The incomplete nature of 1099-DA forms means that both taxpayers and the IRS will be inundated with partial data regarding taxable disposals, which will likely lead to significant confusion and stress as they work to bridge the informational divide.

Historically, crypto tax software has emerged as one of the few practical solutions for active crypto investors facing these compliance challenges. Given the deficiencies in reporting regulations, taxpayers and their advisors will need to continue relying on these digital tools to sidestep potential issues arising from overreporting their taxable gains. These solutions will importantly help streamline the process of tracking, consolidating, and reporting taxable transactions, particularly for those engaged in DeFi. Furthermore, innovative technology like the AI legalese decoder can assist investors and their advisors in interpreting complex legal jargon, ensuring they fully understand their responsibilities and minimizing compliance risks associated with DeFi trading.

Critical Regulatory Considerations

While the repeal of DeFi reporting regulations may initially seem favorable, it is essential to recognize that this is merely an extension of an ongoing journey rather than a final destination. Advocates from the Republican side herald the repeal as a measure to cut compliance costs and preserve the potential for DeFi innovation within U.S. borders. Conversely, concerns have been raised by Democrats regarding the potential erosion of the IRS’s ability to enforce tax compliance. Both perspectives underscore the pressing need for compliance laws that resonate with technological advancements, rather than attempting to force DeFi into outdated regulatory frameworks.

DeFi technology, which relies on innovative smart contracts to facilitate peer-to-peer exchanges sans intermediaries, struggles to fit neatly into the mandates of Section 6045 reporting. The traditional construct of information reporting hinges on centralized entities verifying taxpayer identities and monitoring all on-platform activities, which does not mesh well with the decentralized nature of DeFi platforms. Moreover, effective information reporting plays a crucial role in maintaining tax compliance and combating tax evasion. The repeal opens doors for the IRS, Congress, and industry experts to collaboratively develop a regulatory framework that is more harmonious with the technology underpinning decentralized finance.

Creating such a balanced framework should be prioritized. The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated that repealing DeFi reporting could lead to a staggering $3.9 billion in revenue losses over the next decade. Even with existing broker reporting protocols for centralized exchanges, a considerable concern is that individuals intent on tax evasion may divert their activities from these platforms toward DeFi environments—potentially exacerbating the regulatory gap’s financial repercussions beyond initial estimates.

Implications for Tax Advisers

Clients operating within DeFi must remain acutely aware that the repeal of these reporting requirements does not absolve them of their tax responsibilities. The IRS retains the authority to pursue individuals for unreported income and gains through audits and other investigative measures, including utilizing blockchain forensic tools to trace blockchain activities comprehensively. Therefore, it is vital for tax advisors to stress the significance of diligently maintaining thorough records, proactively tracking activity across diverse platforms, and employing effective tools such as crypto tax software to uphold compliance. The absence of formal DeFi reporting will indeed compound the compliance burdens placed upon taxpayers and their advisors alike.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law and Bloomberg Tax, or its owners.

About the Author

David Canedo is a cryptocurrency tax specialist at CoinTracker, well-versed in navigating the intricate landscape of digital asset taxation.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines