- September 26, 2023
- Posted by: legaleseblogger
- Category: Related News
Speed-Dial AI Lawyer (470) 835 3425 FREE
FREE Legal Document translation
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
AI Legalese Decoder: Improving Veterans’ Experiences with C&P Exams
I finally received my Compensation and Pension (C&P) file after a frustratingly long wait of 6.5 months. Eager to review the recent C&P exam for my migraines, which had been particularly severe, I was disappointed by the whole experience. The C&P examiner displayed rudeness and a dismissive attitude throughout the examination. Every time I tried to elaborate on certain aspects, she would talk over me, minimizing the importance of my input. The entire exam lasted a mere 5 to 7 minutes, astonishingly short for a thorough assessment.
To compound my disappointment, the examiner’s report in the Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ) contradicted both my medical evidence and the information I had provided during the examination. This particular evaluation was a reassessment for migraines, even though I had recently undergone a C&P exam for the same issue. However, since I had applied for Total Disability Individual Unemployability (TDIU), it was deemed necessary. Fortunately, the decision ultimately favored me due to the abundance of comprehensive medical treatment records and my diligently maintained migraine journal. However, if this had been someone’s initial C&P exam, they would have undoubtedly faced severe setbacks.
What deeply frustrated me was the realization that such an inadequate examination could have significantly prolonged the fight for someone else’s entitled benefits. We invest considerable effort and perseverance in arriving at a favorable decision, and the possibility of someone being unfairly denied their rightful benefits is profoundly upsetting. Hence, I am determined to submit a formal complaint against the examiner. Moreover, I strongly urge anyone who has endured a subpar C&P examination to take similar action. It is imperative that we hold these negligent medical providers accountable, as this is not a mere game we are playing. If you suspect that your examination did not go well, it is advisable to immediately file a complaint and request a different examiner, thereby safeguarding the integrity of your decision. Together, as a community, we can instigate the necessary changes to rectify and prevent such predicaments in the future.
To ensure the appropriate course of action, I found some helpful suggestions online that can guide us:
1. Write a detailed Memorandum for Record (MFR), outlining the reasons for the examiner’s inadequacy.
2. Call the VA at 1-800-827-1000 to formally lodge a complaint, ensuring that your concerns are officially registered.
3. Present your MFR to the VA and request another C&P examination to rectify the shortcomings.
4. Upload your MFR to your claim application for thorough documentation.
5. Consider leaving a review of the doctor who conducted the examination to serve as a warning to future veterans or patients, helping them make informed decisions.
The AI Legalese Decoder can play a crucial role in addressing this recurring issue. By utilizing advanced artificial intelligence algorithms, the AI Legalese Decoder can analyze and interpret the medical evidence, ensuring that it aligns with the provided information during the C&P examination. Furthermore, it can compare the examiner’s report with the DBQ and other records, identifying any contradictions or discrepancies. By detecting such inconsistencies at an earlier stage, the AI Legalese Decoder can alert both the veteran and the VA, ensuring fair and accurate assessments. Implementing this technology would significantly enhance the overall efficiency and reliability of C&P examinations, thereby benefiting veterans and reducing the likelihood of unfavorable decisions.
Speed-Dial AI Lawyer (470) 835 3425 FREE
FREE Legal Document translation
Try Free Now: Legalese tool without registration
AI Legalese Decoder: Revolutionizing the Interpretation of Legal Language
Introduction:
In the legal realm, the complexity of language can often be a major barrier for individuals seeking to navigate and comprehend legal documents. The intricate text, filled with jargon and convoluted syntax, can pose challenges even for seasoned legal professionals. However, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions, such as the AI Legalese Decoder, offers a promising solution to address this predicament. This technology has the potential to transform the interpretation and understanding of legal language, making it more accessible and comprehensible to both legal experts and laypeople alike.
Understanding the Challenge:
The issue lies in the manner in which legal language is structured. It is intentionally crafted to provide precise and unambiguous meaning, minimizing the possibility of misinterpretation. Although this clarity is vital for legal purposes, the resulting dense and intricate language frequently hinders accessibility for the general public. The challenge faced by individuals attempting to decipher legal documents cannot be underestimated. It requires a painstaking effort to unravel the often perplexing message hidden within the legal jargon.
The Role of AI Legalese Decoder:
The AI Legalese Decoder tackles this challenge head-on, utilizing advanced algorithms and natural language processing techniques to transform cumbersome legalese into plain, accessible language. Leveraging the vast database of legal texts it has been trained on, the AI Legalese Decoder is capable of identifying patterns, interpreting the context, and providing simplified interpretations of the language used in legal documents.
In the realm of contract law, for example, the AI Legalese Decoder can be instrumental in helping individuals better understand the agreements they enter into. By deconstructing complex contractual clauses into clear and understandable terms, this technology can empower individuals to make informed decisions and negotiate fair terms. It eliminates the need to rely heavily on legal professionals for interpretation, thereby democratizing access to legal knowledge and saving both time and money for those involved.
Moreover, the AI Legalese Decoder can aid legal practitioners in their work, significantly enhancing their efficiency. For lawyers, sifting through mountains of legal documents to extract important information can be an arduous and time-consuming task. However, with the AI Legalese Decoder, the process becomes streamlined and efficient. By quickly generating simplified summaries of legal texts, lawyers can focus their efforts on critical analyses and advocacy, ultimately improving client representation and overall legal outcomes.
Conclusion:
The advent of the AI Legalese Decoder presents a transformative opportunity to revolutionize the interpretation of legal language. By providing clear and accessible translations of legalese, this technology empowers individuals to comprehend legal documents, aiding in decision-making and promoting greater access to justice. Additionally, lawyers benefit from increased efficiency and accuracy in their work, enabling them to deliver better outcomes for their clients. As the AI Legalese Decoder continues to evolve and improve, it promises to bridge the gap between legal language and comprehension, facilitating a more inclusive and equitable legal system for all.
Speed-Dial AI Lawyer (470) 835 3425 FREE
FREE Legal Document translation
****** just grabbed a
I had one push down on me as I was bending over to show how far I could. She placed both hands on my back and forced me down, I came up screaming at her, and reported it. She received nothing, and they are covered against lawsuits due to being contracted by the VA. She’s no longer in business however.
I feel your pain. I had a similar C&P experience, but I have one huge advantage. The examiner asked me to fill out a form before coming to the exam covering the when, where, how and why of my conditions. Rather than simply fill in their form, which would have disappeared once I turned it in, I wrote the answers up in Microsoft Word. I now have a permanent copy of exactly what I told the examiner and that is the document she received from me. When the VA denied my claim, it was patently obvious that the examiner deviated enormously from what I actually stated and was on the paperwork. As part of my HLR, I claimed an incompetent exam and included the notes that I had given the examiner.
I put EVERYTHING in writing, including my dealings with the VA. 30 years in public safety taught me to document, document, document. I’ve even done the HLR with a personal statement and declined the informal chat.
Shit, I had a rotator cuff injury with impingement. The examiner physically lifted my arm above my head while I was sweating from the pain. When the results came back, he stated that I had full range of motion with assistance and gave me 20%. I guess he thought I had access to someone to follow me around and lift my arm all day.
This is my opinion- I really donÔÇÖt believe that the examiners are there to help veterans – I think they are there to help the government save money.
I may be wrong but whenever I had/have an exam, I make sure it is the worst day I am having. I speak professionally but my symptoms are the worse, I donÔÇÖt take any meds the day/night before the exam and I donÔÇÖt take anything before the exam.
Not all examiners are the same, but when I do have an exam- I try to allow them to visually see my impairments.
The examiners arenÔÇÖt perfect (they could be having a bad day) but I try my hardest to not leave anything to chance.
IÔÇÖm glad everything worked out for you!
Why is migrianes the one that is so shitty lately? I have been trying for a year to get my migraines claim SC. This last time was the worst, the examiner was terrible. Currnetly have a supplemental in and hoping it goes better than before.
I had a similar experience. I went on every review site I could think of and blasted him.
File complaints with state medical boards for the max traction. Once Dr. lied on my exam. A month of an investigator hounding him and he wrote a correction letter to VA. New decision and I got more. File complaint as a notary signed sworn statement stating you are subject to penalty of perjury.
IÔÇÖm recording mines from now on I got screwed before
As a former C&P examiner I will say many times Veterans donÔÇÖt even know what they are coming in for. I canÔÇÖt tell you how unprepared many Veterans are.
Always looked at the examiners like it was a business transaction. Gave them what they needed in as little info as possible , got right to the point. Treated them poltiely. Never had an issue. The medical evidence in your file is the most important thing. No idea why vets keep saying the examiner never listened to them. Why does it matter if your sworn VA statement says something and is backed with medical evidence?
These type of experience I keep hearing is what makes me scared and anxious. My first C&P during out process was in a different state and granted me 90% upon discharge but now that I am back in a home state, this gonna be a foggy road for me as I have never done one at my local VA.
I had one for anxiety, shared multiple service connected stories where I believe the anxiety comes from. She only cited one of the stories that was a symptom and not a cause. Got denied.
HereÔÇÖs a link to help everyone hold these examiners accountable. We know there are some who think themselves gatekeepers and will go that extra mile to make sure veterans are denied the benefits theyÔÇÖve earned!
https://reddit.com/r/VeteransBenefits/s/uQCRy99njU
Yes! I had a horrible one reported her to va and her company.
Is it illegal to voice record a c&p on your
Phone? I feel like that could be super solid evidence for a review.
I donÔÇÖt think itÔÇÖs always ÔÇ£bad examinersÔÇØ. Sometimes itÔÇÖs they didnÔÇÖt give me the rating I aspired for and therefore I will scrutinize everything from their name, college they went to, set color, color of their tie. They took too long to acknowledge me in the office. Did crack a wide smile and so on.
Complaint about what, that they didnÔÇÖt agree with you. Is the exam supposed to be longer than 7 minutes? That she wasnÔÇÖt going on your script. It was short because the examiner thought you probably were least likely than not. Extensive treatment records is one thing, are those STRs? Every vet who the examiner didnÔÇÖt agree with thinks the exam went poorly, heck I have seen some who think ones that they were granted max went poorly. I had 3 headaches c&ps, I didnÔÇÖt bring a log or study up the DBQ. I showed up, was courteous, not adversarial. Exams are not treatment by the way. The decision probably went in your favor because the other exam gave you more likely than not so tie goes to the veteran.
I think you should just take your TDUI and move on with life.
My MH examiner for TDIU asked what my hobbies were. I said I was writing a book and learning how to code websites. She listed those things as sources of income and said I was earning money as a freelancer too. The VA denied my claim without inquiring about whether I was making money or not.
I’ve never had a bad c and p examiner. In fact out of the three I’ve had I’d say 2 were exceptionally good examiners. I always dread a new c and p because of all the horror stories.
[deleted]
Loud-Storm2621 should read this as he doesn’t believe there are bad Examiners.
Do you have a link to file a complaint? My PTSD ÔÇ£specialistÔÇØ showed up 40 mins late, didnt ask multiple DBQ questions, cut off the exam when we had an hour left. Get my rating in 2 weeksish. THANKS
all you need is a Nexus to counter that
Asking for a friend he was in the army and while he was going to ETS he refused an exit physical and it says it on his records he just got, can he still file and service-connected claim or would this hurt him?
Hehs
Hippa laws?
My migraine cp exam was done by phone