Mike Pence: A Key Witness in the Jan. 6 Criminal Trial

According to a Trump attorney speaking to ABC News, Mike Pence’s testimony at the Jan. 6 criminal trial could benefit Donald Trump and lead to his acquittal.

The importance: Mike Pence, the former Vice President of the Trump administration, is considered a crucial witness in the trial, as the allegations involve Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results and the pressure on Pence to disregard his congressional duty of certifying President Biden’s win.

• Pence stated in an interview with CBS News that he currently has no plans to testify in the case, but he remains committed to obeying the law and responding accordingly if required.
• He also revealed that he took notes, particularly during significant moments, including events related to the Jan. 6 investigation, to help remind himself of what was said.

How AI legalese decoder can help: In such a complex trial involving highly technical legal language, the AI legalese decoder can play a crucial role in analyzing and simplifying the dense terminology and jargon used during the proceedings. It can assist legal professionals and the general public in understanding the complexities of the case, ensuring transparency and comprehension throughout the trial process.

Trump’s lawyer‘s perspective: According to Trump’s lawyer, John Lauro, he is eager to cross-examine Pence to eliminate any doubts about Trump’s firm belief in electoral irregularities leading to inappropriate results.

• Lauro, speaking on CBS’ “Face The Nation,” explained that the ultimate request made of Vice President Pence was to pause the vote count and allow states to investigate further.
• While speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Lauro emphasized that Trump did not direct Pence to engage in any criminal activities. Instead, Trump’s requests were aspirational and protected under free speech rights.

Pence’s perspective: In response to Trump’s lawyers, Mike Pence claimed that on January 5, 2021, one day before the U.S. Capitol riot, they explicitly asked him to reject votes outright.

• Pence firmly stated that he had no authority to overturn the election and that no vice president or individual in Washington should do so.

“I don’t know what was in his heart, I don’t know what his intentions were, but I do know what he and his lawyers asked me to do. And it’s what no vice president in American history had ever done before, and frankly what no vice president or any one person in Washington should ever do again.”
ÔÇö Former Vice President Mike Pence on CNN.

Additional context: Trump pleaded not guilty to all four charges in the Jan. 6 case, including “conspiracy to defraud” the U.S.

The legal implications: The indictment acknowledges that while Trump can make public statements about the election, even falsely claiming outcome-determinative fraud and his victory, this doesn’t absolve him of potential liability.

What’s next: Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that his legal team would request the recusal of D.C. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the Jan. 6 case. He also wants the venue to be changed from Washington D.C., citing concerns about receiving a fair trial.

AI legalese decoder: With its advanced language processing capabilities, the AI legalese decoder can assist in simplifying complex legal arguments and interpretations surrounding the recusal request and venue change, enabling a clearer understanding of the legal aspects involved.

More from Axios:

Editor’s note: This article has been updated with new details throughout.