Begin your week on a healthy note with STAT’s free newsletter Morning Rounds, offering you essential updates in health and medicine every weekday. Don’t miss out—sign up here!

Good morning! Following an exclusive report by O. Rose Broderick uncovering that certain members of a federal autism advisory committee convened privately, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the addition of 21 new members to the committee. Once again, Rose has provided all the necessary details.

Vaccine Critics Mobilize at State Level

The recent overhaul of the federal vaccine schedule implemented by the Trump administration has left many in the American healthcare system reeling. According to reports from STAT’s Daniel Payne and Isabella Cueto, the reverberations of this decision are likely to be felt more keenly in the upcoming weeks and months, as activists gear up to exploit the newfound momentum to loosen vaccine requirements at the state level.

Many citizens see changes in state law as potentially more impactful than federal regulations. A concerted effort is already underway by various advocacy groups aiming to introduce legislation that would roll back vaccine mandates in nearly all state legislatures throughout the country. Read further to discover who’s spearheading these initiatives and understand the ramifications that could unfold.

Healthcare Worries Top Household Concerns According to Recent Poll

A recent KFF poll has revealed that Americans are increasingly concerned about healthcare costs, overshadowing worries related to other household expenditures such as food, housing, and utilities. An overwhelming 66% of respondents expressed at least some concern regarding their ability to afford healthcare for themselves and their families, with 55% acknowledging that these costs have escalated over the past year. Here are other significant findings from the poll, which surveyed over 1,400 participants:

• Healthcare costs are expected to play a crucial role in shaping the voting preferences of 44% of respondents in the upcoming midterm elections, while 25% indicated that such costs would hold no sway over their decisions, and 31% reported they might have a minor influence.
• 67% of respondents believe Congress erred in not extending the ACA enhanced premium tax credits, although opinions varied notably along party lines. While a strong 89% of Democrats expressed disagreement with the decision, most Republicans (63%) thought Congress acted correctly by allowing the subsidies to lapse.

Innovative Strategy for Contesting State Abortion Bans

In a landmark move, four women along with a physician have initiated a legal challenge against Arkansas’s near-total abortion ban, a law that has been enforceable since the 2022 Dobbs decision but was on the statute books for three years prior. Filed yesterday, the challenge relies on the state constitution’s robust protections of “inherent and inalienable rights,” which encompass the right to pursue personal happiness.

This case marks the debut for Amplify legal, the abortion-focused organization representing the plaintiffs. At a recent press conference, Molly Duane, the group’s litigation director, emphasized that states like Arkansas, Kansas, and North Dakota have broadened constitutional protections significantly beyond those offered federally. Amplify legal intends to utilize state constitutions as a basis for challenging further restrictions, much like a recent case in Wyoming that invalidated a ban based on a constitutional right “to make health care decisions.” Duane announced expectations of unveiling “multiple additional” cases in the near future.

Theresa Van, one of the plaintiffs, shared her traumatic experience of wanting to welcome a second child only to find out, midway through her pregnancy, that it would not survive. Faced with financial constraints and fear of criminal penalties, she continued the pregnancy for seven more weeks. “I wish more people understood that what happened to me is far from unique,” Van recounted during the press conference. She described the aftermath as a lasting trauma: “It doesn’t just end when you leave the hospital.”

The Downfall of a Promising Overdose Antidote

Just two years ago, initial data suggested that Opvee was on track to be a “best-in-class” medication for resuscitating individuals experiencing overdoses, projected to be far more effective than Narcan. However, as reported by STAT’s Lev Facher, a significant obstacle arose: the very population the drug was intended to assist demonstrated a lack of desire for its use.

Initially, many viewed the medication as potentially unnecessary, particularly due to its severe withdrawal symptoms. Complications escalated when New York’s attorney general launched an investigation into the marketing practices of the company. Ultimately, the company ceased all marketing of the drug last fall. For an in-depth look at the company’s downfall and insights into the harm reduction advocates who are celebrating this moment, continue reading Lev’s coverage.

Factors Influencing Adolescent Depression Explored

Two new studies published yesterday examine how various home environments may impact the mental health of young people.

The first study, appearing in JAMA Network Open, sought to determine whether childhood exposure to lead correlates with subsequent mental health outcomes. Researchers tested blood samples from over 200 kids between ages 1 and 12 for lead levels, discovering that higher blood lead concentrations were linked to increased depressive symptoms, especially in adolescents whose exposure occurred later in childhood. Importantly, the association was more pronounced with behavioral symptoms than cognitive-emotional ones, with no similar links found for anxiety traits.

In another study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers utilized commercial health insurance claims data to track changes in young people’s mental health following a parent’s firearm injury. Findings revealed that such injuries were associated with over eight additional psychiatric diagnoses per 1,000 young people (ages 1-19), along with 23 more mental health visits for affected young individuals annually. There were no alterations in the rates of non-psychiatric diagnoses, medical encounters, or services, indicating a focused impact on mental health resources.

Addressing Questions Pertaining to Healthcare for 2026

Two insightful essays featured today pose essential questions about contemporary issues within the healthcare landscape:

What occurs when you share your health information with ChatGPT Health? Liz Salmi, a patient-turned-researcher, divulged her extensive health records to the tool, stemming from her almost two-decade battle with a malignant brain tumor. Salmi highlights ChatGPT Health’s significant potential to bridge disparate data across various health systems. “Referrals come and go, and no single system holds my entire story—except my brain,” she reflects. “Now, partially, in these GPTs.” For more insights on how the tool functioned for her, read on.

Do pediatricians profit excessively from vaccines? A collaborative investigation undertaken by three scientists, including two pediatricians, has sought to demystify this claim. The succinct answer? “No.” Yet, the more intricate analysis reveals that the situation is far from straightforward, undermining pervasive misconceptions about profit margins associated with vaccinations. Discover the nuanced economics involved, what misrepresentations the profit narrative obscures, and the pressing issues that ought to garner our focus.

How AI legalese decoder Can Assist

In the increasingly complex landscape of legal challenges—be it around health care, abortion rights, or vaccine legislation—AI legalese decoder emerges as a vital resource. This advanced tool helps users comprehend intricate legal documents and regulations that often accompany these issues. By translating legal jargon into accessible language, it empowers individuals and advocacy groups to navigate legislative frameworks more effectively. This kind of understanding is crucial for anyone involved in legal challenges or healthcare debates, enabling seamless engagement with the processes that shape health policy and access.

What We’re Reading

• Opinion: How MAHA exploits the flaws of modern science, Undark

• Babies are getting sick from formula that mimics mother’s milk, Bloomberg

• The cruel conditions of ICE’s Mojave Desert detention center, New Yorker
• HHS will allow pharmacies to boycott lifesaving drugs used in medication abortion, Mother Jones
• Trump administration signals there’s widespread desire to curb Medicare Advantage, STAT