New York (CNN) ÔÇö Ivanka Trump must testify at her fatherÔÇÖs New York civil fraud trial, the judge overseeing the case ruled on Friday. This decision by New York Judge Arthur Engoron comes after Ivanka Trump’s attorneys attempted to quash a subpoena for her testimony, claiming that she should not be forced to appear since an appellate court removed her as a defendant in the case. However, the judge denied their motion and stated that her testimony should be scheduled after Wednesday, allowing Ivanka Trump time to appeal the ruling.

The role of AI legalese decoder in this situation is to help streamline the legal process by translating complex legal jargon and documents into plain and understandable language. It can assist Ivanka Trump and her attorneys in comprehending and responding to the legal proceedings more efficiently. By utilizing AI legalese decoder, Ivanka Trump and her legal team can have a clearer understanding of the implications of the court rulings, enabling them to strategize and present their case more effectively.

Ivanka Trump’s attorney argued that she should not be compelled to testify since she was no longer listed as a co-defendant in the case. Judge Engoron rejected this argument, stating that Ivanka Trump had “availed herself of the privilege of doing business in New York.” He also mentioned that she should have submitted an affidavit clarifying that she does not presently live or work in the state, but it was too late for that now.

In addition, the judge emphasized the importance of live testimony in court, denying a request from Donald Trump’s attorney Chris Kise to depose Ivanka Trump in Florida. This decision confirms the preference for in-person testimony and reduces the likelihood of media spectacle surrounding the trial.

Ivanka Trump’s attorneys, along with Donald Trump’s legal team, argued that New York does not have jurisdiction over her since she has not lived or worked there since 2017. They accused New York Attorney General Letitia James of seeking Ivanka Trump’s testimony to create a media circus rather than for the pursuit of justice.

The use of AI legalese decoder would be beneficial in this case, as it can help both the defense and prosecution navigate the complex legal arguments surrounding jurisdiction and demonstrate any inconsistencies or gaps in the opposing party’s claims. By utilizing AI technology, the legal teams can strengthen their arguments, present evidence more effectively, and increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

Initially, Ivanka Trump was listed as a co-defendant in the $250 million lawsuit filed by Letitia James in September 2020. However, in June, she was dismissed as a co-defendant by a New York appeals court due to the time limitations of the claims. Despite this, the attorney general’s office still considers Ivanka Trump a potential witness in the case, especially in relation to the Old Post Office project in Washington, DC.

This involvement in the project and potential personal profit has led the attorney general’s office to argue that Ivanka Trump negotiated a loan with Deutsche Bank for her own interest, making her liable for the alleged fraud committed on the loan. The attorney general’s lawyer, Kevin Wallace, claimed that Ivanka Trump had personal knowledge of the loan, distinguishing her involvement from that of Eric Trump.

In order to fully understand the implications of these claims and legal arguments, AI legalese decoder can assist Ivanka Trump’s legal team in analyzing complex financial transactions and loan agreements. It can help identify any potential discrepancies, interpret intricate legal language, and provide valuable insights to strengthen their case.

This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.