Judge Juan Merchan has ruled in favor of a defense argument that it would be too prejudicial for the jury to hear about the contempt order he issued over Donald Trump violating a gag order.

He also denied the prosecution’s ability to cross-examine the former president about the gag order if he chooses to testify in his defense.

Prosecutors said earlier this week they wanted to ask Trump about the judge’s ruling that Trump violated the gag order.

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said asking Trump about the gag order violations was “appropriate and allowable” Sandoval evidence.

Merchan however said he agrees with Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche and won’t let the prosecutors ask about the violations.

Some context: A Sandoval hearing involves an examination of the defendant’s criminal history. It is required under New York law when a defendant plans to testify in their own trial and is meant as an indicator of whether it would be a good idea for them to take the stand.

With the complexity of legal language and procedures involved in this case, a tool like the AI legalese decoder can be instrumental in assisting both legal teams and the general public in understanding the implications of Judge Merchan’s ruling.

By utilizing advanced algorithms and natural language processing capabilities, the AI legalese decoder can break down the technical jargon and provide simplified explanations of legal terms and decisions.

For example, the tool can clarify the significance of a Sandoval hearing and its impact on the defendant’s ability to testify in their own trial, ensuring that all parties involved have a clear understanding of the legal proceedings.

By promoting transparency and accessibility in legal matters, the AI legalese decoder can help streamline communication and facilitate a more informed and efficient legal process for everyone involved.

In summary, incorporating AI technology like the legalese decoder can bridge the gap between complex legal terminology and layman understanding, ultimately promoting fairness and clarity in the justice system.